Talk:Bioblast 2022: Difference between revisions
From Bioblast
(Replaced content with "__TOC__ == Discussion: The future of BEC == === Beyond counting papers === ::::* Gnaiger_2021_Bioenerg_Commun") Tag: Replaced |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
= Discussion: The future of BEC = | |||
=== | == A discussion on publishing == | ||
[[Gnaiger Erich]] 2022-06-16 | |||
::::* The lockdown phase was a bad timing for starting BEC, since it separated us by preventing real life meetings from happening. Bioblast 2022 is a re-start: We will discuss the future of BEC. | |||
::::* Academic institutions propagate the publication business by imprisoning academic careers into the impact factor lock-up. Do we need a change? How can we change? — Never alone, only by raising awareness collectively. Join [[DORA]]. | |||
::::* ‘Open Access’ at a publication charge of $ 4620? Does the publication charge make a good journal? How can this business model be justified, if scientists would simply refuse to do the jobs in the financial interest of paywall journals? | |||
::::::* [[Gnaiger_2021_Bioenerg_Commun#Pergamon_Press_and_Elsevier |Elsevier and Pergamon Press]] | |||
== Keywords selected from MitoPedia: BEC == | |||
::::» [[MitoPedia: BEC]] | |||
::::* [[Living Communications]] | |||
::::* [[Paywall journalism]] | |||
::::* [[Publication efficiency]] | |||
::::* [[References in BEC https-format]] | |||
== BEC - beyond counting papers == | |||
::::* [[Gnaiger_2021_Bioenerg_Commun]] | ::::* [[Gnaiger_2021_Bioenerg_Commun]] | ||
Revision as of 22:41, 16 June 2022
Discussion: The future of BEC
A discussion on publishing
Gnaiger Erich 2022-06-16
- The lockdown phase was a bad timing for starting BEC, since it separated us by preventing real life meetings from happening. Bioblast 2022 is a re-start: We will discuss the future of BEC.
- Academic institutions propagate the publication business by imprisoning academic careers into the impact factor lock-up. Do we need a change? How can we change? — Never alone, only by raising awareness collectively. Join DORA.
- ‘Open Access’ at a publication charge of $ 4620? Does the publication charge make a good journal? How can this business model be justified, if scientists would simply refuse to do the jobs in the financial interest of paywall journals?
