Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More information

Difference between revisions of "Murphy 2009 Biochem J"

From Bioblast
Line 9: Line 9:
== Cited by ==
== Cited by ==
{{Template:Cited by Komlodi 2021 MitoFit Tissue normoxia}}
{{Template:Cited by Komlodi 2021 MitoFit Tissue normoxia}}
{{Template:Cited by Komlodi 2021 MitoFit AmR}}
{{Labeling
{{Labeling
|additional=MitoFit 2021 Tissue normoxia
|additional=MitoFit 2021 Tissue normoxia, MitoFit 2021 AmR
}}
}}

Revision as of 10:23, 6 December 2021

Publications in the MiPMap
Murphy MP (2009) How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem J 417:1-13.

Β» PMID:19061483 Open Access

Murphy MP (2009) Biochem J

Abstract: The production of ROS (reactive oxygen species) by mammalian mitochondria is important because it underlies oxidative damage in many pathologies and contributes to retrograde redox signalling from the organelle to the cytosol and nucleus. Superoxide (O2β€’βˆ’) is the proximal mitochondrial ROS, and in the present review I outline the principles that govern O2β€’βˆ’ production within the matrix of mammalian mitochondria. The flux of O2β€’βˆ’ is related to the concentration of potential electron donors, the local concentration of O2 and the second-order rate constants for the reactions between them. Two modes of operation by isolated mitochondria result in significant O2β€’βˆ’ production, predominantly from complex I: (i) when the mitochondria are not making ATP and consequently have a high Ξ”p (protonmotive force) and a reduced CoQ (coenzyme Q) pool; and (ii) when there is a high NADH/NAD+ ratio in the mitochondrial matrix. For mitochondria that are actively making ATP, and consequently have a lower Ξ”p and NADH/NAD+ ratio, the extent of O2β€’βˆ’ production is far lower. The generation of O2β€’βˆ’ within the mitochondrial matrix depends critically on Ξ”p, the NADH/NAD+ and CoQH2/CoQ ratios and the local O2 concentration, which are all highly variable and difficult to measure in vivo. Consequently, it is not possible to estimate O2β€’βˆ’ generation by mitochondria in vivo from O2β€’βˆ’-production rates by isolated mitochondria, and such extrapolations in the literature are misleading. Even so, the description outlined here facilitates the understanding of factors that favour mitochondrial ROS production. There is a clear need to develop better methods to measure mitochondrial O2β€’βˆ’ and H2O2 formation in vivo, as uncertainty about these values hampers studies on the role of mitochondrial ROS in pathological oxidative damage and redox signaling.

Cited by

  • Komlodi et al (2022) Hydrogen peroxide production, mitochondrial membrane potential and the coenzyme Q redox state measured at tissue normoxia and experimental hyperoxia in heart mitochondria. MitoFit Preprints 2021 (in prep)
  • KomlΓ³di T, Schmitt S, Zdrazilova L, Donnelly C, Zischka H, Gnaiger E. Oxygen dependence of hydrogen peroxide production in isolated mitochondria and permeabilized cells. MitoFit Preprints (in prep).

Labels:






MitoFit 2021 Tissue normoxia, MitoFit 2021 AmR