Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More information

Neylon 2017 F1000Research

From Bioblast
Revision as of 11:46, 18 April 2019 by Gnaiger Erich (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Publication |title=Neylon C, Pattinson D, Bilder G, Lin J (2017) On the origin of nonequivalent states: How we can talk about preprints [version 1; referees: 2 approved]. F1...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Publications in the MiPMap
Neylon C, Pattinson D, Bilder G, Lin J (2017) On the origin of nonequivalent states: How we can talk about preprints [version 1; referees: 2 approved]. F1000Research 6:608 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11408.1.

» F1000Research Open Access

Neylon C, Pattinson D, Bilder G, Lin J (2017) F1000Research

Abstract: Increasingly, preprints are at the center of conversations across the research ecosystem. But disagreements remain about the role they play. Do they “count” for research assessment? Is it ok to post preprints in more than one place? In this paper, we argue that these discussions often conflate two separate issues, the history of the manuscript and the status granted it by different communities. In this paper, we propose a new model that distinguishes the characteristics of the object, its “state”, from the subjective “standing” granted to it by different communities. This provides a way to discuss the difference in practices between communities, which will deliver more productive conversations and facilitate negotiation, as well as sharpening our focus on the role of different stakeholders on how to collectively improve the process of scholarly communications not only for preprints, but other forms of scholarly contributions.

Bioblast editor: Gnaiger E


Labels:






Preprints