Sarabipour 2018 Nature: Difference between revisions
From Bioblast
(Created page with "{{Publication |title=Sarabipour S (2018) Preprints are good for science and good for the public. Nature 560:553. |info=[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158619 PMID:...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Publication | {{Publication | ||
|title=Sarabipour S (2018) Preprints are good for science and good for the public. Nature 560:553. | |title=Sarabipour S (2018) Preprints are good for science and good for the public. Nature 560:553. | ||
|info=[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158619 PMID: | |info=[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158619 PMID: 30158619 Open Access] | ||
|authors=Sarabipour S | |authors=Sarabipour S | ||
|year=2018 | |year=2018 | ||
|journal=Nature | |journal=Nature | ||
|abstract=We disagree with Tom Sheldon’s contention that the preprint ecosystem can present a challenge to accurate and timely journalism (Nature 559, 445; 2018). Restricting when or how preprints are released risks suppressing science communication without any clear advantage to the public. | |||
|keywords=Preprints | |||
|editor=[[Gnaiger E]], | |||
}} | |||
{{Labeling | |||
|additional=Preprints, | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 02:17, 26 February 2019
| Sarabipour S (2018) Preprints are good for science and good for the public. Nature 560:553. |
Sarabipour S (2018) Nature
Abstract: We disagree with Tom Sheldon’s contention that the preprint ecosystem can present a challenge to accurate and timely journalism (Nature 559, 445; 2018). Restricting when or how preprints are released risks suppressing science communication without any clear advantage to the public. • Keywords: Preprints • Bioblast editor: Gnaiger E
Labels:
Preprints
