Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More information

Search results

From Bioblast
Results 21 – 49 of 210
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • == Preprint == ::::<big>'''* Preprint released 2020-08-11 » [[Gnaiger MitoFit Preprints 2020.4 |Canonical reviewer's comments on: Bureau International de
    2 KB (311 words) - 12:24, 1 May 2024
  • {{MitoFit page name}} ...aiser J (2017) In a 'forgotten experiment,' biologists almost launched the preprint revolution—5 decades ago. Science doi:10.1126/science.aap7593.
    1,004 bytes (131 words) - 10:10, 25 February 2019
  • {{MitoFit page name}} ...nt years, however, thanks to the launch of additional, discipline-specific preprint platforms and increased support by funders and initiatives such as ASAPBio[
    2 KB (301 words) - 15:14, 26 February 2019
  • {{MitoFit page name}} |title=Berg J (2017) Preprint ecosystems. Science 357:1331.
    1 KB (137 words) - 10:42, 27 March 2019
  • {{MitoFit page name}} ...arify the new policy decision, this editorial provides a brief overview of preprint servers and describes their role in biomedical research.
    2 KB (285 words) - 01:50, 26 February 2019
  • {{MitoFit page name}} ...l of the IEGs and explores the parallels with the 1990s and the biomedical preprint movement of today.
    1,010 bytes (137 words) - 11:19, 18 January 2021
  • {{MitoFit page name}} |title=Chalmers I, Glasziou P (2016) Should there be greater use of preprint servers for publishing reports of biomedical science?. F1000Research 5:272
    1 KB (148 words) - 01:33, 26 February 2019
  • == MitoFit Preprint == ::::» [[Oliveira 2023 MitoFit Spotlight]]
    3 KB (342 words) - 16:39, 6 November 2023
  • == MitoFit Preprint == ::::» [[Gainutdinov 2022 MitoFit]]
    3 KB (375 words) - 06:59, 8 January 2023
  • {{MitoFit page name}} ...fter one month of high fat, high sucrose feeding. https://doi.org/10.26124/mitofit:ea19.MiPSchool.0004
    4 KB (511 words) - 08:29, 8 January 2023
  • {{MitoFit page name}} |title=da Silva JAT (2018) The preprint debate: What are the issues?. Med J Armed Forces India 74:162-64.
    2 KB (274 words) - 10:08, 25 February 2019
  • == MitoFit Preprint == ::::» [[Rodriguez 2023 MitoFit]]
    3 KB (368 words) - 16:13, 21 August 2023
  • == MitoFit Preprint == ...it Preprint Arch [[doi:10.26124/mitofit:190003]]. - [[Schoepf 2019 MitoFit Preprint Arch |»Bioblast link«]]
    3 KB (410 words) - 16:11, 4 June 2022
  • ...lve more scientists in peer review. PREreview (Post, Read, and Engage with preprint reviews) provides a centralized hub in which participants of scientific jou {{Template:Cited by Gnaiger 2019 MitoFit Preprints}}
    889 bytes (111 words) - 19:46, 17 January 2021
  • {{MitoFit page name}} ...ttopadhyay A (2016) search.bioPreprint: a discovery tool for cutting edge, preprint biomedical research articles. F1000Research 5:1396 https://doi.org/10.12688
    3 KB (414 words) - 01:27, 26 February 2019
  • ...iew makes it easier to start and run a Preprint Journal Club, or integrate preprint review into conventional journal clubs. PREreview seeks to diversify peer r ...ondrial physiology and bioenergetics. MitoFit Preprint Arch [[doi:10.26124/mitofit:190002]]
    2 KB (273 words) - 17:56, 24 April 2020
  • {{MitoFit page name}} |title=Jackson A (2002) From preprints to e-prints: the rise of electronic preprint servers in mathematics. Notices Amer Mathemat Soc 49:23–32.
    4 KB (561 words) - 19:48, 17 January 2021
  • == MitoFit Preprints == ...dited. © remains with the authors, who have granted MitoFit an Open Access preprint license in perpetuity.
    2 KB (242 words) - 05:20, 15 November 2022
  • {{MitoFit page name}} ...eprint archive. The intention, however, is that by posting an article on a preprint archive, the article is freely accessible and will receive comments from th
    2 KB (333 words) - 14:35, 26 February 2019
  • ...8 preprints that were uploaded to bioRxiv.org, the largest biology-focused preprint server, in its first five years. We find that preprints on bioRxiv are bein {{Template:Cited by Gnaiger 2019 MitoFit Preprints}}
    2 KB (255 words) - 19:38, 17 January 2021

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)